Universalism & The Religion of Modernity

Universalism & The Religion
of Modernity
What is Universalism? It is the belief that a specific religion or ideology is applicable and true for all places and for all times, for all nations, peoples and cultures, regardless of socio-economic, geographic and ethnic/racial differences which should, and even MUST submit themselves according to the universalist morality of that specific ideology or religion.
It is also the belief that a specific universalist morality is the only morality by which all should abide.
Examples of universalist ideologies is Marxism/Communism and modern Liberalism, but certain religions too fall under this category like modern Christianity and modern Islam (is explained in depth below), though to a much lesser extant than their secular/atheistic counterparts due to their religious nature.
Universalist ideologies and religions, like any other, also have their own morality, varying in degree from each other.
For example, in Communism, which in theory is the most universalistic of them all, the goal is to achieve a worldly utopia where all humans must be equal, where any kind of hierarchy and distinction must not exist and all social classes, religions, borders, gender, racial & cultural differences must be abolished because Communism does not recognize these differences. But rather considers these differences like religion, to be man made, oppressive and thus superficial and an obstacle to overcome in the pursuit of a worldly utopia.
In Marxist/Communist outlook the partition of Pakistan and India should never have happened, and a Muslim (monotheist) fraternizing/mating with a Hindu (polytheist) is a very good thing because it destroys religious distinction between the two.
Modern Western Liberalism is now carrying on the torch of universalism in the form of Cultural Marxism which expresses itself in such social phenomenons like Trans-genderism (to overcome traditional gender distinctions), Trans-racialism (to overcome racial/ethnic/cultural distinctions), and open-borders (to erase all nations & national boundaries).
In fact Marxism has expressed itself much more successfully through Liberalism than it ever could in its political & economic (communist) form and has thus been absorbed by Liberalism through which it excels far better.
 Early Christianity & Islam
as Original Universalisms
Before the two major secular Universalisms (Liberalism & Marxism) of modernity, there were two religious universalisms; Christianity (first) and Islam (second).
This example is expressed within the following statements of the two religions:
In Christianity: Jesus (AS) sacrificed himself for the sins of humanity.
In Islam: Prophet Muhammad (SAW) was a mercy upon humanity.
In both cases humanity was/is stressed. And both Christianity and Islam hold the view that they came to wipe away previously held norms of society which conflicted with their teachings (Islam more so than Christianity since the latter officially ended up adopting many pre-Christian traditions).
Both religions either reject (in Christianity’s case) or downplay (in Islam’s case) or do not recognize at all (according to many modern scholars of both religions) racial or ethnic differences.
But even the universalism of early Islam and early Christianity had its limits. Both religions made distinctions between a “believer” and a “non-believer”, eg a Muslim is not permitted to marry a polytheist, a Muslim woman cannot marry a non-Muslim, among other hierarchical beliefs. This is not including other cultural and implicitly ethnic/racial distinctions Muslim majority regions ended up making despite the ostensibly contrary teachings of Islam now purported by modern Islamic scholars. In other words, by modern secular universalism’s standards both religions fell short in their universalism.
Officially Reformed Christianity
& Un-Officially Reformed Islam
One of the major components of the zeitgeist of modernity is universalism. And whichever ideology or worldview is the most universalistic (accepting and inclusive) in its outlook and morality is the one that embodies the soul of modernity.
Early Christianity and Islam fell short of the acceptable standards on the measuring scale of modern universalism. Marxism and Liberalism far surpassed the two religions in their universalist morality.
Therefore the two religions are now playing catch-up with their secular/atheistic counterparts to avoid being relegated to the bin of “outdated” and “backwards”. In the case of Christianity it is officially playing catch-up.
This is exemplified by the numerous reformations Western Christianity (which is the dominant Christianity) has undergone in the form of permitting gay marriage, trans-genderism, Feminism, interfaith marriages with Atheists and other non-Christians and even out-of-wedlock sexual relationships and the resulting births have been accepted by the new reformed Christianity.
Modern Western Christianity is now officially a part of the Liberal world order.
Islam has un-officially (for now, the way things are going it might become official soon) joined the race.
This can be seen in many gradual “progressive” trends within Muslim populations of the West as well as within traditionally Muslim regions of the Islamic world.
Linda Sarsour, Prominent Muslim American 
“civil rights activist” supports gay marriage
Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/09/tunisia-lifts-ban-muslim-women-marrying-muslims-170914154657961.html
Muslim women marrying non-Muslim men, once
a practice done in secret due to its impermmissability
and social repercussions, now officially allowed
So many Muslims nowadays can be observed pushing the whole mantra of “racial equality/race mixing”, “gender equality”, and now even “homosexual marriage” and “trans-genderism” in order to obtain for Islam the official title of modernity’s official religion.

Why Women Have Terrible Judgement When It Comes To Men

By now we are all familiar with the cliche story about the young “innocent” girl who pursues the “bad boy”, opening herself up to his advances only to serve his sexual urges until he satisfies his lust and moves on to greener pastures, leaving her heart-broken, or in worst case scenario pregnant with his seed to face a turbulent future alone.

Typical reaction: “oh, but how could this have happened?” “Why are men so evil!?!?”

And of course, ALL men are blamed, even the sharif ones who are in the majority and have nothing to do with dumb girls and their self-destructive choices.

Well, let’s see how this does happen and why men aren’t the only guilty party:


Mass murderer Nikolas Cruz is getting stacks of fan mail and love letters sent to the Broward County jail, along with hundreds of dollars in contributions to his commissary account.

Teenage girls and women are writing to the Parkland school shooter and sending photographs — some suggestive — tucked inside cute greeting cards and attached to notebook paper with offers of friendship and encouragement. Groupies also are joining Facebook communities to talk about how to help the killer.

A teenager wrote on March 15: “I’m 18-years-old. I’m a senior in high school. When I saw your picture on the television, something attracted me to you.”

A woman from Chicago enclosed nine suggestive photos, including a shot of cleavage, another in a skimpy bikini eating a Popsicle and a tight shot of her backside as she bent over. Another girl sent photos with Hello Kitty Snapchat filters.



The attraction of women to prison bad boys echoes the fascination with killers like notorious cult leader Charles Manson. Lyle and Erik Menendez, the Beverly Hills brothers convicted in 1994 of murdering their parents, attracted a pair of brides while spending life in prison. So-called “Bundyphiles” sent bags of mail to Ted Bundy, the serial rapist-murderer who was electrocuted on Florida’s Death Row in 1989.



Women by their very nature are not attracted to sharif guys (good-boys). They are only attracted to the kind of men who will use and abuse them and then toss them to the side after they are of no use any longer.

Don’t believe me? Just take a look at most film “hero’s”. They’re not exactly Namazi, Parhaizgar Rozaydar’s.

Books like “Fifty Shades of Grey” wouldn’t even be a thing if women weren’t attracted to the worst kind of men. This book, which glorifies torture sex, aka rape, aka sexual abuse, has sold more than 200 million copies world wide.



Fifty Shades of Grey, a book that glorifies rape, sexual abuse and torture sex is popular with your average woman.


So, the big question is why do women go for the worst kind of men? The answer is simple: they are adult children.

You see, when you leave a child to their own devices they will often do things that are detrimental to themselves and this is why the presence of an adult is necessary, particularly an adult man who has a strong authority in the household.

This is why in all traditional & patriarchal societies of the past the dominant male of the household (usually father or husband) had to protect his women folk from the lures of lustful sexual predators and tharkis who only seek to exploit the childlike women.



Peak Feminism: Sexual Favors For Free Housing

In a traditional society the male relative(s), primarily the father or the husband looked after and took care of female relatives financial needs whilst also protecting them from predatory males who desired to sexually exploit them.

But since that was “evil” “patriarchy” which Feminism had to destroy because “strong women” don’t need men, now “modern” women have to fulfill all of these roles that at one point men did, only women are doing a terrible job of it since they are not biologically accustomed to do so.

This is “Freedom” and Women’s “Liberation”: Source

A landlord who offers free accommodation in return for sex says the ‘arrangements’ are not against the law, which he says take place with consenting adults, and that he frequently rejects messages from 16 and 17-year-olds.

His justification comes after recent figures claimed 250,000 women in Britain are being offered free or discounted rent in exchange for sexual favours, according to a This Morning special investigation.

Researcher Enya Quin-Jarvis came across a ‘hundred of adverts’ across the UK, offering the ‘friends with benefits’ living arrangement.

Presenters Holly Willoughby and Phillip Schofield spoke to the landlord, who chose to remain anonymous insisted there was nothing wrong with his ‘arrangements’.

This is what happens when you allow females free-reign to make their own decisions.

Explaining what he’s looking for, he added: ‘I’m seeking an arrangement. I’m very honest in what I say. I’m very forward and honest and don’t tell lies. I have been married and I have a family.

‘But I find that modern day relationships do not work and if they do they only work for a short period of time. Most females lie. They are working to an agenda.

Where’s the lie in that?

‘I offer them a life, more than a fully stocked fridge. They are still in touch with me. I’m not a pervert. It’s an arranged relationship. I have a fantastic life and I just want to share it.’

One may call this guy a greasy slimy pervert, but the fact does not change that women are willing to give sexual favors to men whom they perceive to be in power in exchange for resources (in this case rent-free living).

No matter how much you empower women, the sexual dynamics will remain the same. Women will always seek to provide powerful men with sex in exchange for resources. This can be destructive for a healthy society if left unchecked because the resulting offspring will not know who their father is and no man would want to take responsibility for children he does not perceive to be his own.

Historically traditional social institutions like the patriarchal family & marriage kept such destructive tendencies in check: female’s virginity for the male’s resources. A virgin female guarantees that the children are from a a single father while the father is now obligated to look after those children and their mother. But Feminists have destroyed the institution of marriage because it “empowers patriarchy”.

But hey, sexual predators and perverts are having a field day taking turns with these “liberated” women who’s bastard children no one will own up to.

UN: Pakistanis Must Have Bastard Children, Pak Gov.t Considers

The world’s most useless organization that has been unable to stop the genocide and ethnic-cleansing of Palestinians and Kashmiris, that did not prevent the slaughter of Muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, is now demanding Pakistan legalize consensual extra-marital/pre-marital sex. The UN was created by Western powers to keep the third world down while protecting their and their allies (Israel) interests.
And our government is considering this request. No surprise, Pakistani government is full of political prostitutes who kiss @$$ for anyone willing to pay.
If Pakistani leaders have any spine they will tell the UN to go f**k itself and fix Palestine before asking us to incorporate social degeneracy into our country.
And before the “but it’s already happening” crowd, well guess what else has already been happening? Suicide bombings, extra-judicial killings, institutional corruption, fraud, robberies, etc. Let’s officially legalize those as well?
And before the “but zina doesn’t harm anyone if it’s consensual” crowd, yes it does. It harms society. It leads to increase in STD’s, children without fathers, single-motherhood, poverty, banditry, homelessness, increase in prostitution (for girls who grow up without a father).
And before the “are you suggesting we go backwards to the 7th century?” crowd. Right, as if allowing a free-for-all sex will not bring us down to the level of beasts of the wild.
Anyhow, lets take a look at the wonders that come from children who don’t know who their father is or grow up without a father:
  • With the increasing number of premarital births and a continuing high divorce rate, the proportion of children living with just one parent rose from 9.1% in 1960 to 20.7% in 2012. Currently, 55.1% of all black children, 31.1% of all Hispanic children, and 20.7% of all white children are living in single-parent homes.
    Source: U.S. Census Bureau. “Living Arrangements of Children Under 18 Years Old: 1960 to Present”. U.S.  Census Bureau July 1, 2012.

Poverty In Single Mother Households:


– Children in father-absent homes are almost four times more likely to be poor. In 2011, 12 percent of children in married-couple families were living in poverty, compared to 44 percent of children in mother-only families.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Children’s Living Arrangements and Characteristics: March 2011, Table C8. Washington D.C.: 2011.

– Children living in female headed families with no spouse present had a poverty rate of 47.6 percent, over 4 times the rate in married-couple families.

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; ASEP Issue Brief: Information on Poverty and Income Statistics. September 12, 2012

Children in female-only headed households at higher rate of exposure to poverty
compared to married couple households where both parents are present. (Source)

Drug & Alcohol Abuse in Single Mother Households:

– The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services states, “Fatherless children are at a dramatically greater risk of drug and alcohol abuse.”

Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics. Survey on Child Health. Washington, DC, 1993.


Physical & Emotional Health Problems:

– A study of 1,977 children age 3 and older living with a residential father or father figure found that children living with married biological parents had significantly fewer externalizing and internalizing behavioral problems than children living with at least one non-biological parent.

Source: Hofferth, S. L. (2006). Residential father family type and child well-being: investment versus selection. Demography, 43, 53-7B

Children born to single mothers show higher levels of aggressive behavior than children born to married mothers. Living in a single-mother household is equivalent to experiencing 5.25 partnership transitions.

Source: Osborne, C., & McLanahan, S. (2007). Partnership instability and child well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1065-1083.


Greater Likelihood of Committing Crime:

– Adolescents living in intact families are less likely to engage in delinquency than their peers living in non-intact families. Compared to peers in intact families, adolescents in single-parent families and stepfamilies were more likely to engage in delinquency.

Source: Stephen Demuth and Susan L. Brown, “Family Structure, Family Processes, and Adolescent Delinquency: Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 41, No. 1 (February 2004): 58-81.


Increased Likelihood of Early Sexual Activity

– A study using a sample of 1409 rural southern adolescents (851 females and 558 males) aged 11 – 18 years, investigated the correlation between father absence and self-reported sexual activity. The results revealed that adolescents in father-absence homes were more likely to report being sexually active compared to adolescents living with their fathers.

Source: Hendricks, C.S., Cesario, S.K., Murdaugh, C., Gibbons, M.E., Servonsky, E.J., Bobadilla, R.V., Hendricks, D.L., Spencer-Morgan, B., & Tavakoli, A. (2005).

– Being raised by a single mother raises the risk of teen pregnancy, marrying with less than a high school degree, and forming a marriage where both partners have less than a high school degree.

Source: Teachman, Jay D. “The Childhood Living Arrangements of Children and the Characteristics of Their Marriages.” Journal of Family Issues 25 (January 2004): 86-111.








Happy National Men’s Day, Pakistan!!

DISCLAIMER: None of the images used are my own. I acquired them through Google images.

If we’re gonna have a “women’s day” then hey why not one for men? After all it takes two to tango. Don’t get me wrong, when it comes to the average Pakistani neither gender has it easy, but our Liberals/”Feminist” elites who impose their Western morality on the rest of Pakistan try to paint a one sided picture and sideline half of the Pakistani population. They follow every trend in the West, whether “Feminism”, or “gay rights”, or the recent #metoo movement, they are just rehashing what the White man is doing and imposing it on Pakistanis.

What with the whole “International Women’s Day” rona dhona that we have been hearing for the past few days from our Feminists/Liberals, i thought well why not open a similar thread to appreciate the silent gender? The one that complains less and does more! The one that makes less noise but suffers silently nonetheless and soldiers on? Yes, i’m talking about the Pakistani men, whether they are the stone crushers working in the toxic environment of the stone crushing factories to feed their families, or the soldiers fighting in the below freezing weather in Siachen. Whether they are men like Abdul Qadeer Khan or Pakistan’s founding father Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, they do their duty and don’t even ask for recognition from the world.

Here’s to our brothers, father’s, sons and uncles! Here’s to Pakistani men!

Here’s to our brothers in Siachen
While we sleep in the comforts of our warm beds, they stay up to fight the nations enemy in below-freezing temperatures where even oxygen is scarce. Yet they soldier on because they have a nation to protect and no time to complain.

Here’s to our brothers in Kashmir

Who are fighting the good fight under a hail of enemy sniper and machine-gun fire. Just recently four Pakistani soldiers were martyred by indian firing across the LoC. Yet they soldier on because they have a nation to preserve and no time to complain.


Here’s to our brothers in the FATA

Who are at the forefront of keeping our country safe from Indian & Afghan funded terrorism. Many of them were beheaded, even tortured by militants, others were massacred by NATO (Salala incident). Yet they still soldier on because they have a nation to preserve and no time to complain.

pakistani soldiers in tribal areas - Google Search.png

Here’s to our Shuhada

They gave their lives in the name of Islam and Pakistan, both known and unknown, to ensure that it’s people may continue to live as a sovereign nation. They had a nation to preserve and no time to complain.


Here’s to our brothers working the Stone Crushing Factories

A job with a very high mortality rate due to the inhalation of toxic dust released from crushing stones. But these men soldier on because they have families to feed and no time to complain.


Here’s to our brothers working in Mines and Quarries

Going hundreds of feet underground, hours without seeing any sunlight, often without adequate protective gear, toiling in those mines where many face certain death and many have died as a result, yet they soldier on because they have families to look after and no time complain.


Here’s to our brothers navigating the dangerous Karakorum

Through the snaking roads and the cratered pathways, these brave men risk being crushed by boulders and burried alive by landslides, and many have indeed fallen victim to such and died as a result. Yet they still soldier on because they have families to feed and no time to complain.

pakistani-truck-drivers-karakoram-highway (1).jpg

Here’s to our fathers who liberated what we today proudly call Azad Kashmir

When the call to arms was sounded by Quaid-e-Azam, they did not hesitate to respond, despite being outnumbered and outgunned by superior Indian Army units. They did not ask “why?”, But rather “when and where?”. Today our brothers in Azad Kashmir don’t have to fear being tortured and burried in unmarked graves, nor do our sisters in Azad Kashmir have to fear being raped, nor the Masjids have to bear the treads of Indian boots. All because these brave men answered the call of duty. They had no time to complain.


Here’s to our fathers who fell in the line of duty in the Indo-Pak wars

Like their fathers before them and like their sons after them, these brave men gave their lives for their homeland and in so doing they have inspired millions. They came from the ranks of the average Pakistani. Where they fell they left a permanent symbol of Pakistan. They too did their duty and did not complain.


Pakstani Liberals & Their Love For Anything Anti-Pakistan

The recent ban on the showing of Bollywood film “PadMan” in Pakistan has caused the butt-hurt celebrity Liberals on our side of the border to come out and make tweets against the banning of the movie. Ostensibly because the film “spreads public awareness” about the female menstrual cycle.

Spreads awareness to whom though? To men? Why would any Pakistani man need a film, that too a Bollywood film, to teach him about the female menstrual cycle?

Any man who has some female relative(s) like a mother, sister(s), a wife, daughter(s), etc. inevitably at some point in his life will come to know of this matter, albeit not every minute detail of it, though eventually he will come to know of them.

In our society the younger generations receive knowledge on important matters from their elders. This has been the norm for centuries. The boys from their male relatives and the girls from their female relatives. Therefore it is absurd to even assume that a Bollywood film will somehow enlighten our population on such issues.

That our Liberals think a Bollywood film will inform the population about menstruation only goes to show that these people are completely disconnected from Pakistani society & culture and are living in their own little mental bubble and their disdain for the culture and traditions of the common Pakistani is not hidden either. This is not surprising considering most of them have grown up in the West and are now imposing their beliefs on the rest of Pakistan.

Take for example these tweets:

There is something called Public Decency, wherein out of respect for oneself and for others you do not discuss your private matters for everyone to see, hear and know. By the very same token would one also announce to the public when they have diarrhea? Pakistani Liberals not withstanding, any normal Pakistani would not.

Now i’m not surprised that the assault on public decency within Pakistani culture is being lead by Pakistani Liberals. While our sons are fighting in the LoC in Kashmir, many of whom have been martyred by Indian bullets, sacrificing their lives for their country, behind their backs the subversive element that are our Liberals are championing Indian movies and the tearing down of all social decency and norms that the average Pakistanis who make up the rank-and-file of our armed forces hold dear to their hearts and are putting their lives on the line for. This is treason, plain and simple.


Funeral prayer of a Pakistani soldier martyred in the Line of Control (LoC) by Indian firing. Image courtesy of MaverickPakistani.com

But wait, there’s more:

Ah, right. She’s a Feminist and she grew up in the West which explains everything about people like her, that is they have nothing in common with the struggles of the common Pakistani, they do not share our traditions, our dresses, our cultural norms and instead belittle us and lecture us from their moral high horse to teach us “backward peasants” the “way” to “true progress”. They impose their Western morality on the rest of us.

But one only has to look to the West where most of our Pakistani Liberal elites get their indoctrination from and see what these people seek to impose on the rest of us Pakistanis:

Brave Feminists Paint With Menstrual Blood – BuzzFeed.com

Hero Feminist Uses Own Vaginal Yeast To Bake Bread – WomensHealth.com


To know what Pakistani Liberals want our future to look like, simply look at the modern West where they get their morality from. Image courtesy of Chicago Reader

The Plight of Mohmand’s Laborers

There is a major problem of neglect of safety of manual laborers in Pakistani construction and other related industries. It’s common to see workers without basic equipment as hard hats, face masks and safety goggles. As anyone who has any familiarity with construction related work can attest to the many health and safety hazards involved in this type of work.

From Express Tribune:

Ashraf says he used to work as a labourer with the recently deceased Ayaz Khan at a stone crushing factory in Shabqadar.

Ayaz, Ashraf says, was the tenth colleague he had lost in recent years due to health complications arising as a result of the dust spewed by stone crushing machines.

You would think that this factory would have been closed down a long time ago after the cause of death had become apparent. There is a complete disregard for the well-being and safety of manual laborers who are often viewed as being disposable and don’t really have a voice to speak on their behalf in the corridors of power.

“If the government fails to protect labourers, more such deaths can be expected in the locality,” Ashraf said as he coughed. He too is showing early symptoms of a dry cough and asthma.

The government in Pakistan is inept and not much can really be expected from it unless there is a major national uproar like there was in the rape and murder case of the two adolescent girls this past January. But to expect a national uproar over the deaths of manual laborers of a stone crushing factory, with Pakistani celebrities and media personalities leading the way on social media in giving this issue exposure, is wishful thinking.

Entire article from Express Tribune can be accessed here: https://tribune.com.pk/story/1628960/1-breathing-dust-mohmands-labourers-crushed-struggle-life/