By now we are all familiar with the cliche story about the young “innocent” girl who pursues the “bad boy”, opening herself up to his advances only to serve his sexual urges until he satisfies his lust and moves on to greener pastures, leaving her heart-broken, or in worst case scenario pregnant with his seed to face a turbulent future alone.
Typical reaction: “oh, but how could this have happened?” “Why are men so evil!?!?”
And of course, ALL men are blamed, even the sharif ones who are in the majority and have nothing to do with dumb girls and their self-destructive choices.
Well, let’s see how this does happen and why men aren’t the only guilty party:
Mass murderer Nikolas Cruz is getting stacks of fan mail and love letters sent to the Broward County jail, along with hundreds of dollars in contributions to his commissary account.
Teenage girls and women are writing to the Parkland school shooter and sending photographs — some suggestive — tucked inside cute greeting cards and attached to notebook paper with offers of friendship and encouragement. Groupies also are joining Facebook communities to talk about how to help the killer.
A teenager wrote on March 15: “I’m 18-years-old. I’m a senior in high school. When I saw your picture on the television, something attracted me to you.”
A woman from Chicago enclosed nine suggestive photos, including a shot of cleavage, another in a skimpy bikini eating a Popsicle and a tight shot of her backside as she bent over. Another girl sent photos with Hello Kitty Snapchat filters.
The attraction of women to prison bad boys echoes the fascination with killers like notorious cult leader Charles Manson. Lyle and Erik Menendez, the Beverly Hills brothers convicted in 1994 of murdering their parents, attracted a pair of brides while spending life in prison. So-called “Bundyphiles” sent bags of mail to Ted Bundy, the serial rapist-murderer who was electrocuted on Florida’s Death Row in 1989.
Women by their very nature are not attracted to sharif guys (good-boys). They are only attracted to the kind of men who will use and abuse them and then toss them to the side after they are of no use any longer.
Don’t believe me? Just take a look at most film “hero’s”. They’re not exactly Namazi, Parhaizgar Rozaydar’s.
Books like “Fifty Shades of Grey” wouldn’t even be a thing if women weren’t attracted to the worst kind of men. This book, which glorifies torture sex, aka rape, aka sexual abuse, has sold more than 200 million copies world wide.
Fifty Shades of Grey, a book that glorifies rape, sexual abuse and torture sex is popular with your average woman.
So, the big question is why do women go for the worst kind of men? The answer is simple: they are adult children.
You see, when you leave a child to their own devices they will often do things that are detrimental to themselves and this is why the presence of an adult is necessary, particularly an adult man who has a strong authority in the household.
This is why in all traditional & patriarchal societies of the past the dominant male of the household (usually father or husband) had to protect his women folk from the lures of lustful sexual predators and tharkis who only seek to exploit the childlike women.
In a traditional society the male relative(s), primarily the father or the husband looked after and took care of female relatives financial needs whilst also protecting them from predatory males who desired to sexually exploit them.
But since that was “evil” “patriarchy” which Feminism had to destroy because “strong women” don’t need men, now “modern” women have to fulfill all of these roles that at one point men did, only women are doing a terrible job of it since they are not biologically accustomed to do so.
This is “Freedom” and Women’s “Liberation”: Source
A landlord who offers free accommodation in return for sex says the ‘arrangements’ are not against the law, which he says take place with consenting adults, and that he frequently rejects messages from 16 and 17-year-olds.
His justification comes after recent figures claimed 250,000 women in Britain are being offered free or discounted rent in exchange for sexual favours, according to a This Morning special investigation.
Researcher Enya Quin-Jarvis came across a ‘hundred of adverts’ across the UK, offering the ‘friends with benefits’ living arrangement.
Presenters Holly Willoughby and Phillip Schofield spoke to the landlord, who chose to remain anonymous insisted there was nothing wrong with his ‘arrangements’.
This is what happens when you allow females free-reign to make their own decisions.
Explaining what he’s looking for, he added: ‘I’m seeking an arrangement. I’m very honest in what I say. I’m very forward and honest and don’t tell lies. I have been married and I have a family.
‘But I find that modern day relationships do not work and if they do they only work for a short period of time. Most females lie. They are working to an agenda.
Where’s the lie in that?
‘I offer them a life, more than a fully stocked fridge. They are still in touch with me. I’m not a pervert. It’s an arranged relationship. I have a fantastic life and I just want to share it.’
One may call this guy a greasy slimy pervert, but the fact does not change that women are willing to give sexual favors to men whom they perceive to be in power in exchange for resources (in this case rent-free living).
No matter how much you empower women, the sexual dynamics will remain the same. Women will always seek to provide powerful men with sex in exchange for resources. This can be destructive for a healthy society if left unchecked because the resulting offspring will not know who their father is and no man would want to take responsibility for children he does not perceive to be his own.
Historically traditional social institutions like the patriarchal family & marriage kept such destructive tendencies in check: female’s virginity for the male’s resources. A virgin female guarantees that the children are from a a single father while the father is now obligated to look after those children and their mother. But Feminists have destroyed the institution of marriage because it “empowers patriarchy”.
But hey, sexual predators and perverts are having a field day taking turns with these “liberated” women who’s bastard children no one will own up to.
- With the increasing number of premarital births and a continuing high divorce rate, the proportion of children living with just one parent rose from 9.1% in 1960 to 20.7% in 2012. Currently, 55.1% of all black children, 31.1% of all Hispanic children, and 20.7% of all white children are living in single-parent homes.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau. “Living Arrangements of Children Under 18 Years Old: 1960 to Present”. U.S. Census Bureau July 1, 2012.
Poverty In Single Mother Households:
– Children in father-absent homes are almost four times more likely to be poor. In 2011, 12 percent of children in married-couple families were living in poverty, compared to 44 percent of children in mother-only families.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Children’s Living Arrangements and Characteristics: March 2011, Table C8. Washington D.C.: 2011.
– Children living in female headed families with no spouse present had a poverty rate of 47.6 percent, over 4 times the rate in married-couple families.
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; ASEP Issue Brief: Information on Poverty and Income Statistics. September 12, 2012
Drug & Alcohol Abuse in Single Mother Households:
– The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services states, “Fatherless children are at a dramatically greater risk of drug and alcohol abuse.”
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Center for Health Statistics. Survey on Child Health. Washington, DC, 1993.
Physical & Emotional Health Problems:
– A study of 1,977 children age 3 and older living with a residential father or father figure found that children living with married biological parents had significantly fewer externalizing and internalizing behavioral problems than children living with at least one non-biological parent.
Source: Hofferth, S. L. (2006). Residential father family type and child well-being: investment versus selection. Demography, 43, 53-7B
Children born to single mothers show higher levels of aggressive behavior than children born to married mothers. Living in a single-mother household is equivalent to experiencing 5.25 partnership transitions.
Source: Osborne, C., & McLanahan, S. (2007). Partnership instability and child well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1065-1083.
Greater Likelihood of Committing Crime:
– Adolescents living in intact families are less likely to engage in delinquency than their peers living in non-intact families. Compared to peers in intact families, adolescents in single-parent families and stepfamilies were more likely to engage in delinquency.
Source: Stephen Demuth and Susan L. Brown, “Family Structure, Family Processes, and Adolescent Delinquency: Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 41, No. 1 (February 2004): 58-81.
Increased Likelihood of Early Sexual Activity
– A study using a sample of 1409 rural southern adolescents (851 females and 558 males) aged 11 – 18 years, investigated the correlation between father absence and self-reported sexual activity. The results revealed that adolescents in father-absence homes were more likely to report being sexually active compared to adolescents living with their fathers.
Source: Hendricks, C.S., Cesario, S.K., Murdaugh, C., Gibbons, M.E., Servonsky, E.J., Bobadilla, R.V., Hendricks, D.L., Spencer-Morgan, B., & Tavakoli, A. (2005).
– Being raised by a single mother raises the risk of teen pregnancy, marrying with less than a high school degree, and forming a marriage where both partners have less than a high school degree.
Source: Teachman, Jay D. “The Childhood Living Arrangements of Children and the Characteristics of Their Marriages.” Journal of Family Issues 25 (January 2004): 86-111.
DISCLAIMER: None of the images used are my own. I acquired them through Google images.
If we’re gonna have a “women’s day” then hey why not one for men? After all it takes two to tango. Don’t get me wrong, when it comes to the average Pakistani neither gender has it easy, but our Liberals/”Feminist” elites who impose their Western morality on the rest of Pakistan try to paint a one sided picture and sideline half of the Pakistani population. They follow every trend in the West, whether “Feminism”, or “gay rights”, or the recent #metoo movement, they are just rehashing what the White man is doing and imposing it on Pakistanis.
What with the whole “International Women’s Day” rona dhona that we have been hearing for the past few days from our Feminists/Liberals, i thought well why not open a similar thread to appreciate the silent gender? The one that complains less and does more! The one that makes less noise but suffers silently nonetheless and soldiers on? Yes, i’m talking about the Pakistani men, whether they are the stone crushers working in the toxic environment of the stone crushing factories to feed their families, or the soldiers fighting in the below freezing weather in Siachen. Whether they are men like Abdul Qadeer Khan or Pakistan’s founding father Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, they do their duty and don’t even ask for recognition from the world.
Here’s to our brothers, father’s, sons and uncles! Here’s to Pakistani men!
Here’s to our brothers in Kashmir
Who are fighting the good fight under a hail of enemy sniper and machine-gun fire. Just recently four Pakistani soldiers were martyred by indian firing across the LoC. Yet they soldier on because they have a nation to preserve and no time to complain.
Here’s to our brothers in the FATA
Who are at the forefront of keeping our country safe from Indian & Afghan funded terrorism. Many of them were beheaded, even tortured by militants, others were massacred by NATO (Salala incident). Yet they still soldier on because they have a nation to preserve and no time to complain.
Here’s to our Shuhada
They gave their lives in the name of Islam and Pakistan, both known and unknown, to ensure that it’s people may continue to live as a sovereign nation. They had a nation to preserve and no time to complain.
Here’s to our brothers working the Stone Crushing Factories
A job with a very high mortality rate due to the inhalation of toxic dust released from crushing stones. But these men soldier on because they have families to feed and no time to complain.
Here’s to our brothers working in Mines and Quarries
Going hundreds of feet underground, hours without seeing any sunlight, often without adequate protective gear, toiling in those mines where many face certain death and many have died as a result, yet they soldier on because they have families to look after and no time complain.
Here’s to our brothers navigating the dangerous Karakorum
Through the snaking roads and the cratered pathways, these brave men risk being crushed by boulders and burried alive by landslides, and many have indeed fallen victim to such and died as a result. Yet they still soldier on because they have families to feed and no time to complain.
Here’s to our fathers who liberated what we today proudly call Azad Kashmir
When the call to arms was sounded by Quaid-e-Azam, they did not hesitate to respond, despite being outnumbered and outgunned by superior Indian Army units. They did not ask “why?”, But rather “when and where?”. Today our brothers in Azad Kashmir don’t have to fear being tortured and burried in unmarked graves, nor do our sisters in Azad Kashmir have to fear being raped, nor the Masjids have to bear the treads of Indian boots. All because these brave men answered the call of duty. They had no time to complain.
Here’s to our fathers who fell in the line of duty in the Indo-Pak wars
Like their fathers before them and like their sons after them, these brave men gave their lives for their homeland and in so doing they have inspired millions. They came from the ranks of the average Pakistani. Where they fell they left a permanent symbol of Pakistan. They too did their duty and did not complain.